![\"ULSU\"](\"http:\/\/www.anfocal.ie\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/02\/ULSU-570x320.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
By Tom\u00e1s Heneghan<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The University of Limerick Students\u2019 Union (ULSU) is to lobby the next government to lower student fees and extend Seanad Election voting rights to University of Limerick graduates.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The decision to both lobby for lower student fees and for the extension of voting rights was taken at the ULSU Union General Meeting (UGM) last Wednesday.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There had been issues with the original proposal on student fees proposed by third year student, Chris Collins, with the original proposal reading: \u201cULSU urges the next government to lower the cost of third level fees by \u20ac500, to reject any proposal to increase third level fees and\/or the introduction of income contingent loan scheme.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
After a minor change, ULSU President, Colin Clarke questioned the inclusion of \u20ac500 in the proposal. He asked: \u201cWhy \u20ac500? Why not \u20ac1,000 or \u20ac1,500?\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Mr. Collins explained: \u201cThe Labour Party recently announced that\u2019s what they plan to do. That\u2019s what it\u2019s based off of, other policies, it\u2019s not plucked out of the air.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u201cThis is just a small stepping stone on the road to reforming education and that\u2019s just a start. That\u2019s what it\u2019s based on.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
ULSU Academic Officer, Marian O\u2019Donnell argued: \u201cIt\u2019s kind of dangerous to predict your policy based on the outcome of an election that hasn\u2019t happened yet and you don\u2019t know what the education policy is, so I would be inclined to think that perhaps it should be changed, that we take out the \u20ac500 and just that they campaign to lower fees.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Ms. O\u2019Donnell proposed to amend the original proposal to: \u201cULSU urges the next government to lower the cost of third level fees.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There were three votes against the amendment and one abstention, with the amendment passing by majority vote.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There was a question related to what action the proposal would translate to if passed by the students, with Mr. Clarke clarifying that it would involve various forms of lobbying from the Students\u2019 Union.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Mr. Clarke explained: \u201cI\u2019d imagine it would be a press statement from myself and take that to local [media]. I would request a meeting with the Minister for Education.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
ULSU Democracy Development Manager, Liz Gabbett also explained that the Union is a registered lobbying organisation.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Ms. Gabbett said of the proposal: \u201cBasically this is asking ULSU to lobby of behalf of students to lower the cost of third level fees, so whether that\u2019s press releases or letters to the Government, that\u2019s basically what you\u2019re asking the current sabbatical officers and future sabbatical officers, unless changed at a UGM.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The new proposal was passed with only one abstention.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The proposal on the issue of Seanad elections was made by ULSU Academic Officer, Marian O\u2019Donnell and called on ULSU to lobby and campaign to allow UL graduates to vote in the Seanad Elections.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Speaking on the Seanad proposal, Ms. O\u2019Donnell said: \u201cThere are six Seanad seats that are meant to represent third level education. The only people who can vote for them are graduates from Trinity, UCD, NUIG, Maynooth and UCC.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u201cSo UL and DCU are the only two universities who are unable to vote on those six senators who are meant to represent third level education, along with all the ITs as well of course.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\u201cIn 1979 there was a referendum that brought in legislation that basically said that the Oireachtas could add more universities or third level institutions to this, they\u2019ve just never used that legislation, they\u2019ve never enacted it and basically all UL graduates can\u2019t vote for Seanad elections and get those six senators to represent us.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Ms. O\u2019Donnell said the proposal would allow ULSU to lobby the government to enact the 1979 law and allow UL graduates to vote in the Seanad elections.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The proposal was unanimously passed by the UGM attendees.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
ULSU President, Colin Clarke also spoke at length about the proposed new student centre. He said that the previous qualified majority clause operated during the last two referenda on the issue in 2012 and 2014 would not apply in the upcoming referendum.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There were a number of constitutional amendments earlier in the evening which passed after some discussion around phrasing of the amendments.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
There was also a presentation on ULSU financial accounts and, later, General Manager of the Union, Martin Ryan spoke to the UGM about ULSU\u2019s upcoming Strategic Plan.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The UGM ended with reports from the Executive Officers and a first look at the Charity Week 2016 promotional video, in which details of next week\u2019s Charity Week events and activities were first revealed.<\/p>\n